Principles of Forbidding Evil
Contributor:
Coverage:
Creator: Salim Bahnasawi
Date:
Description:
Format: text
Identifier: http://www.islaam.com/Article.aspx?id=468
Language: en
Publisher:
Relation:
Rights:
Source:
Subject: character
Title: Principles of Forbidding Evil
Created on: Wed Dec 26 13:33:20 -0500 2007
Updated on: Wed Dec 26 13:33:20 -0500 2007
Version: 1
Abstract: ... re, not every caller to Islam is capable to assume the role of a mufti who will pass Shari`ah judgments, nor is he competent to work in criticizing evil actions done by Muslims, whether their leaders or general folk. Whoever is interested in fame and recognition of his criticism of evil actions should not take part in this work, because that is, in fact, a type of hypocrisy. Sincerity, which is essential for this type of work, cannot be found in the heart of one who desires power and fame. Hatred of a particular evil action by one’s heart requires leaving the place where such an action is committed, as well as the people involved. Continuing companionship with such people, while one is able to leave them, is a type of acceptance of something that Islam has forbidden. In general rules of removing evil also falls humble and secret advising, and not stressing one’s teaching position in relation to others. Whoever claims to be an `aalim is in fact an ignorant. Objecting to opinions of mujtahidoon in secondary matters is a type of ignorance of methods of removing evil actions, since considering another’s opinion (derived through legitimate ijtihad) an evil deed that has to be removed, can only be done by one who ascribes to oneself lordship that gives him the right to speak in the name of Allah the Most High, and to declare what is permissible and what is forbidden. Not applying principles of removing evil in secondary matters does not mean keeping silent about the truth, not having discussions grounded in knowledge, or not giving advice in matters of religion. Some Islamic scholars reached positions where they were able to enforce opinions they considered right. However, if the issue was a secondary matter, they would not exercise their power. At-Tabari relates that `Umar ibn al-Khattab met a man and asked him about his case: What have you done about it?He responded – Ali and Zayd judged such as such.`Umar said: If it were me, I would have done like this.The man asked: What prevents you, for you have the rule and power?`Umar responded: If I had evidences in the Book of Allah or the Sunnah of the Messenger, sallallahu `alaihi wa sallam, I would do so. However, I am relying on my opinion, and opinions fall in a general category. Imam M... [Full Article...]
